Shoe Ski Opinion


Home
Up

 


Give the gift of Camp

You will not be able to view this item unless your browser supports Java Script

Sign our Guestbook

View our Guestbook


email.gif (12281 bytes)
Click to send us an email


Please be sure to support the companies that help support the growth of the sport:

 

 

                                        

 

 

 

Chuck,

Enjoyed your article on shoe skis, and just wanted to add my two cents.  I've used every ski out there in trying to learn one foot wakes and surface turns, and my opinions are similar to yours with some caveats.

First just a note for the ladies:  Size always matters.  In this case, smaller is better.  The Dawg Paws can now be ordered in small sizes to fit women's and children's feet.  I own a pair of men's size 6, which just fit my size 8 feet.  I like these much better than my original paw's (men's size 11).  My feet don't slide around in them, and they are smaller in size than a pair of cut down Scarpa skis.  This gives a more realistic transition to barefooting than going from the larger skis to my feet.  I started using them for wakes, and I agree with you, they are the best ski on the market for learning one foot wakes.  They are also very durable and don't break easily. 

One ski you didn't mention was a modification of the Scarpa ski.  The ski can be ordered larger for beginners, or cut down (several of us have cut down our own using a band saw) to a size that is comparable or smaller than the Dawg Paws.  Most of my friends use these and are extremely pleased with them.  I like them for turns as much as the dawg paws, and they have the advantage of being very easy to take on and off - especially nice when you want to mix up shoes with feet.  Another advantage of the Scarpa and Seipel ski's is that they dry quickly.  This is important for you morning skiers who are loathe to leaving damp equipment in the trunk of your car while you go to work.  

With respect to Seipel's skis, Joel Brookshire talked me into using them for learning turns.  You mentioned that they can be used at slow speeds.  For women, this can be very helpful.  We tend to not have the upper body strength that men do.  Therefore I had trouble transitioning from the shoes to my feet on the front to back due in large part to the big difference in pull on my arms.  The very slow speed allowed on the Seipel skis provided drag, giving an arm pull similar to the feet.

I always enjoy objective reviews of the equipment.  Thanks for providing such a great forum for discussion.

Andrea Eggert